Relationship research / Posts 2–5

Post 1

Read left to right. Click a slide to read it on its own, then use the arrows.

Four colour options, one narrative per post. Post 1 is unchanged.

Post 2 · How couples argue

Cream

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

During arguments in happy, lasting marriages:

For every hurtful thing partners said or did,

they said or did at least five kind things.

The Gottman Institute’s summary of its research.

SLIDE 2 / 3

What did kindness look like during an argument?

Kind words and gestures

Listening with interest. Sharing a laugh.

Hurtful words and gestures

Rolling your eyes. Dismissing your partner’s feelings.

Examples described by The Gottman Institute.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Researchers watched couples argue, then followed up years later.

They filmed a 15-minute discussion about a disagreement.

Later, they checked which couples were still married.

This was an observed pattern, not a test of whether five kind gestures prevent a divorce.

Research: John Gottman & Robert Levenson.

Source: The Gottman Institute
“The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science” (2017).

Plum

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

During arguments in happy, lasting marriages:

For every hurtful thing partners said or did,

they said or did at least five kind things.

The Gottman Institute’s summary of its research.

SLIDE 2 / 3

What did kindness look like during an argument?

Kind words and gestures

Listening with interest. Sharing a laugh.

Hurtful words and gestures

Rolling your eyes. Dismissing your partner’s feelings.

Examples described by The Gottman Institute.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Researchers watched couples argue, then followed up years later.

They filmed a 15-minute discussion about a disagreement.

Later, they checked which couples were still married.

This was an observed pattern, not a test of whether five kind gestures prevent a divorce.

Research: John Gottman & Robert Levenson.

Source: The Gottman Institute
“The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science” (2017).

Cream + raspberry

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

During arguments in happy, lasting marriages:

For every hurtful thing partners said or did,

they said or did at least five kind things.

The Gottman Institute’s summary of its research.

SLIDE 2 / 3

What did kindness look like during an argument?

Kind words and gestures

Listening with interest. Sharing a laugh.

Hurtful words and gestures

Rolling your eyes. Dismissing your partner’s feelings.

Examples described by The Gottman Institute.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Researchers watched couples argue, then followed up years later.

They filmed a 15-minute discussion about a disagreement.

Later, they checked which couples were still married.

This was an observed pattern, not a test of whether five kind gestures prevent a divorce.

Research: John Gottman & Robert Levenson.

Source: The Gottman Institute
“The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science” (2017).

Paper

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

During arguments in happy, lasting marriages:

For every hurtful thing partners said or did,

they said or did at least five kind things.

The Gottman Institute’s summary of its research.

SLIDE 2 / 3

What did kindness look like during an argument?

Kind words and gestures

Listening with interest. Sharing a laugh.

Hurtful words and gestures

Rolling your eyes. Dismissing your partner’s feelings.

Examples described by The Gottman Institute.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Researchers watched couples argue, then followed up years later.

They filmed a 15-minute discussion about a disagreement.

Later, they checked which couples were still married.

This was an observed pattern, not a test of whether five kind gestures prevent a divorce.

Research: John Gottman & Robert Levenson.

Source: The Gottman Institute
“The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science” (2017).

Post 3 · Affection before a later divorce

Cream

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

A 13-year study of marriage

Affection at the start of marriage

Happily married 13 years later

Divorced after 7+ years

The couples who divorced after 7+ years showed each other more affection.

About a third more than couples happily married 13 years later.

SLIDE 2 / 3

A 13-year study began with 168 newlywed couples.

Each spouse was asked how often their partner had shown them affection the day before.

Examples in the study:

Complimenting their partner

Saying “I love you”

SLIDE 3 / 3

For the couples who divorced after 7+ years, affection for each other fell sharply in the first year.

First year of marriage

Affection

After 7+ years

Divorce

Source: Huston et al. (2001). The Connubial Crucible.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237

Plum

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

A 13-year study of marriage

Affection at the start of marriage

Happily married 13 years later

Divorced after 7+ years

The couples who divorced after 7+ years showed each other more affection.

About a third more than couples happily married 13 years later.

SLIDE 2 / 3

A 13-year study began with 168 newlywed couples.

Each spouse was asked how often their partner had shown them affection the day before.

Examples in the study:

Complimenting their partner

Saying “I love you”

SLIDE 3 / 3

For the couples who divorced after 7+ years, affection for each other fell sharply in the first year.

First year of marriage

Affection

After 7+ years

Divorce

Source: Huston et al. (2001). The Connubial Crucible.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237

Cream + raspberry

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

A 13-year study of marriage

Affection at the start of marriage

Happily married 13 years later

Divorced after 7+ years

The couples who divorced after 7+ years showed each other more affection.

About a third more than couples happily married 13 years later.

SLIDE 2 / 3

A 13-year study began with 168 newlywed couples.

Each spouse was asked how often their partner had shown them affection the day before.

Examples in the study:

Complimenting their partner

Saying “I love you”

SLIDE 3 / 3

For the couples who divorced after 7+ years, affection for each other fell sharply in the first year.

First year of marriage

Affection

After 7+ years

Divorce

Source: Huston et al. (2001). The Connubial Crucible.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237

Paper

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

A 13-year study of marriage

Affection at the start of marriage

Happily married 13 years later

Divorced after 7+ years

The couples who divorced after 7+ years showed each other more affection.

About a third more than couples happily married 13 years later.

SLIDE 2 / 3

A 13-year study began with 168 newlywed couples.

Each spouse was asked how often their partner had shown them affection the day before.

Examples in the study:

Complimenting their partner

Saying “I love you”

SLIDE 3 / 3

For the couples who divorced after 7+ years, affection for each other fell sharply in the first year.

First year of marriage

Affection

After 7+ years

Divorce

Source: Huston et al. (2001). The Connubial Crucible.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237

Post 4 · When the distance ends

Cream

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

180 college students had begun living closer to their long-distance partner.
More than 1 in 3 later broke up.

180 now lived closer

114
still dating

66
broke up

Relationship status at the time of the survey

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers surveyed 335 college students about their long-distance relationships.

180

had begun living closer to their partner.

Students looked back on that change. Living nearby did not necessarily mean sharing a home.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Students described what changed after the move.

Some enjoyed more time with their partner.

Some felt they had less time for themselves, friends or family.

From a selected group of 72 students.
The study cannot show that moving caused breakups.

Stafford, Merolla & Castle (2006)
When long-distance dating partners become geographically close

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
23(6), 901–919 · DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070472

Plum

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

180 college students had begun living closer to their long-distance partner.
More than 1 in 3 later broke up.

180 now lived closer

114
still dating

66
broke up

Relationship status at the time of the survey

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers surveyed 335 college students about their long-distance relationships.

180

had begun living closer to their partner.

Students looked back on that change. Living nearby did not necessarily mean sharing a home.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Students described what changed after the move.

Some enjoyed more time with their partner.

Some felt they had less time for themselves, friends or family.

From a selected group of 72 students.
The study cannot show that moving caused breakups.

Stafford, Merolla & Castle (2006)
When long-distance dating partners become geographically close

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
23(6), 901–919 · DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070472

Cream + raspberry

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

180 college students had begun living closer to their long-distance partner.
More than 1 in 3 later broke up.

180 now lived closer

114
still dating

66
broke up

Relationship status at the time of the survey

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers surveyed 335 college students about their long-distance relationships.

180

had begun living closer to their partner.

Students looked back on that change. Living nearby did not necessarily mean sharing a home.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Students described what changed after the move.

Some enjoyed more time with their partner.

Some felt they had less time for themselves, friends or family.

From a selected group of 72 students.
The study cannot show that moving caused breakups.

Stafford, Merolla & Castle (2006)
When long-distance dating partners become geographically close

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
23(6), 901–919 · DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070472

Paper

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

180 college students had begun living closer to their long-distance partner.
More than 1 in 3 later broke up.

180 now lived closer

114
still dating

66
broke up

Relationship status at the time of the survey

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers surveyed 335 college students about their long-distance relationships.

180

had begun living closer to their partner.

Students looked back on that change. Living nearby did not necessarily mean sharing a home.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Students described what changed after the move.

Some enjoyed more time with their partner.

Some felt they had less time for themselves, friends or family.

From a selected group of 72 students.
The study cannot show that moving caused breakups.

Stafford, Merolla & Castle (2006)
When long-distance dating partners become geographically close

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
23(6), 901–919 · DOI: 10.1177/0265407506070472

Post 5 · Feeling alike and liking someone

Cream

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

For people who already
knew each other:

Thinking they had more in common with someone

went with liking
that person more.

Having similar
views or
personalities

did not show
the same clear
connection.

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers reviewed 313 studies of liking and attraction.

The full review included strangers, friends and romantic partners.

The review gathered studies of shared traits and studies of what people believed they had in common with someone.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Across the full review, both kinds of similarity went with liking someone more.

That included studies of people who had never met or had only just met.

The findings do not prove that shared traits never matter, or that feeling alike causes liking.

Montoya, Horton & Kirchner (2008).
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Plum

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

For people who already
knew each other:

Thinking they had more in common with someone

went with liking
that person more.

Having similar
views or
personalities

did not show
the same clear
connection.

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers reviewed 313 studies of liking and attraction.

The full review included strangers, friends and romantic partners.

The review gathered studies of shared traits and studies of what people believed they had in common with someone.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Across the full review, both kinds of similarity went with liking someone more.

That included studies of people who had never met or had only just met.

The findings do not prove that shared traits never matter, or that feeling alike causes liking.

Montoya, Horton & Kirchner (2008).
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Cream + raspberry

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

For people who already
knew each other:

Thinking they had more in common with someone

went with liking
that person more.

Having similar
views or
personalities

did not show
the same clear
connection.

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers reviewed 313 studies of liking and attraction.

The full review included strangers, friends and romantic partners.

The review gathered studies of shared traits and studies of what people believed they had in common with someone.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Across the full review, both kinds of similarity went with liking someone more.

That included studies of people who had never met or had only just met.

The findings do not prove that shared traits never matter, or that feeling alike causes liking.

Montoya, Horton & Kirchner (2008).
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Paper

SLIDE 1 / 3
RELATIONSHIP RESEARCH

For people who already
knew each other:

Thinking they had more in common with someone

went with liking
that person more.

Having similar
views or
personalities

did not show
the same clear
connection.

SLIDE 2 / 3

Researchers reviewed 313 studies of liking and attraction.

The full review included strangers, friends and romantic partners.

The review gathered studies of shared traits and studies of what people believed they had in common with someone.

SLIDE 3 / 3

Across the full review, both kinds of similarity went with liking someone more.

That included studies of people who had never met or had only just met.

The findings do not prove that shared traits never matter, or that feeling alike causes liking.

Montoya, Horton & Kirchner (2008).
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Caption and research references · outside the artwork

During disagreements, happy, stable marriages showed substantially more kind than hurtful behaviour. The Gottman Institute summarizes the pattern as at least five positive interactions for each negative one. Listening with interest and shared humour are among its examples; eye-rolling and dismissing a partner’s feelings are negative examples.

This carousel uses the Institute’s public interaction-based summary. Its 2020 explanation also describes the original result in terms of time in positive or neutral versus negative emotional states. These are not interchangeable new measurements. The graphic illustrates the public 5:1 summary, not six reconstructed observations or a transcript.

The work observed couples and followed their marriages over time. It does not show that five kind acts cancel one hurtful act, nor that a single argument predicts an individual marriage’s future.

The Gottman Institute · The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science (2017)

The Gottman Institute · The Magic Ratio: The Key to Relationship Satisfaction (2020)

Caption and research references · outside the artwork

A 13-year study of 168 newlywed couples found different paths to divorce. The subgroup whose marriages lasted at least seven years began with about one-third more affection than couples who were happily married at follow-up. Their affection then fell sharply during the first year.

Affection was reported by spouses in diary interviews. Examples included compliments and saying “I love you.” The finding is a group pattern from this study, not a prediction about an individual marriage. The study does not establish that affection, or its decline, caused divorce.

Huston et al. (2001), The Connubial Crucible

Caption and research references · outside the artwork

A 2006 survey of 335 college students examined long-distance dating relationships. Of the 180 who had begun living closer to a partner, 66 reported that the relationship had ended afterward. That is 36.7%; 114 were still dating when surveyed.

The detailed analysis of changes used a selected group of 72 students, split equally between continuing and ended relationships. Their accounts included both benefits and difficulties. Moving closer did not necessarily mean moving into the same home.

Timing caveat: the abstract describes one-third breaking up within three months, but the methods report that two-thirds of the 66 breakups occurred within that window, equivalent to 44 of 180. This post uses the unambiguous total after reunion and makes no three-month claim. Retrospective self-reports do not establish that moving closer caused a breakup.

Stafford, Merolla & Castle (2006), original article

Author-uploaded full text

Caption and research references · outside the artwork

A 2008 meta-analysis examined actual and perceived similarity in attitudes and personality. The scope included romantic and nonromantic attraction. The existing-relationship finding is an association, not a causal claim.

Montoya, Horton & Kirchner (2008), Is actual similarity necessary for attraction?